Okay, so I saw this “Past Life Lovers Test” thing trending, and I was like, “Why not?” I’m always up for a little fun, even if it’s probably just silly. I grabbed my phone, found a quiet spot on the couch, and started looking for a test.
I found a couple of, uh, let’s call them questionable websites, but eventually, I settled on one that looked halfway decent. You know, not too many flashing ads or weird pop-ups. It had a simple design.
I started the test. The questions were kind of what you’d expect. Stuff like, “What’s your favorite historical period?” and “Which of these romantic tropes appeals to you most?” It was all pretty general, nothing that felt too personal, which was good. I’m always a little wary of giving away too much info online, you know?
- First few were multiple choice, picking landscapes and ideal dates.
- Then came some “choose a word that resonates” type deals.
- And, of course, a few “what would you do in this situation?” questions.
I answered everything as honestly as I could, trying not to overthink it. I mean, it’s a past life lovers test, not a personality assessment, right? So I just went with my gut.
The Result
After I finished all the questions, the website took a second to “calculate” my results. Drumroll please… apparently, my past life lover was a…wait for it… “Victorian-era artist with a rebellious streak.”
I’m not gonna lie, I kind of chuckled. It’s so vague and romantic, it’s almost comical. The description talked about passionate encounters in dimly lit studios and shared dreams of changing the world. It was all very dramatic, in classic test result. I don’t know how much I believe in any of this, but the description was a fun little read. Maybe i have a good story to tell, base on the result.
Honestly, the whole thing was a good 15-minute distraction. Would I recommend it? Sure, if you’re bored and looking for a bit of lighthearted entertainment. Just don’t take it too seriously, okay? It’s all in good fun. And, maybe I will try other tests to see if I get something totally different next time, haha.
